As the property market of Singapore has been booming at a rate beyond what most people can imagine, some are already worry that the property bubble might pop soon. To prevent the property market from going bust, many measures had been put in place by the government over the years to sustain the the market and ensure that the property market of Singapore remain affordable and competitive.
This time round just when the elections are around the corner, there come another new rule to maintain a stable and sustainable property market.
The Government announced today the following measures to maintain a stable and sustainable property market:
- Increase the holding period for imposition of Seller’s Stamp Duty (SSD) from the current one year to three years.
- For property buyers who already have one or more outstanding housing loans1 at the time of the new housing purchase:
The measures will take immediate effect on 30 August 2010.
- Increase the minimum cash payment from 5% to 10% of the valuation limit2; and
- Decrease the Loan-to-Value (LTV) limit for housing loans granted by financial institutions regulated by MAS to these buyers from the current 80% to 70%.
The Government's objective is to ensure a stable and sustainable property market where prices move in line with economic fundamentals. The property market is currently very buoyant. While the rate of price increase of private residential properties has moderated in the last 3 quarters, prices have still increased significantly by 11% in the first half of 2010, and price levels have now exceeded the historical peak in the second quarter of 1996.
While Singapore has enjoyed strong economic growth in the first half of 2010, our economic growth is expected to moderate in the second half of the year. There are also still uncertainties in the global economy. Should economic growth falter and the market corrects, property buyers could face capital losses, with implications on their own finances and the economy as a whole. Moreover, the current low global interest rate environment will not continue indefinitely, and higher interest rates could have severe implications for buyers who have overextended themselves. Therefore, the Government has decided to introduce additional measures now to temper sentiments and encourage greater financial prudence among property purchasers.
Extending the Holding Period for Imposition of Seller’s Stamp Duty (SSD) on Residential Properties Sold from 1 Year to 3 Years
The Government imposed in February 2010 a seller’s stamp duty (SSD) for sellers who buy residential properties3 on or after 20 February 2010 and sell them within a year of purchase.
For residential properties bought4 on or after 30 August 2010, SSD will be imposed if these properties are sold within three years of purchase. Specifically, the SSD levied on residential properties will be revised to as follows:
No SSD will be payable by the vendor if the property is sold more than 3 years after it was bought. Please see Annex for examples of how the SSD will be computed.
- Sold within the first year of purchase, i.e. the property is held for 1 year or less from its purchase date – The full SSD rate (1% for the first $180,000 of the consideration, 2% for the next $180,000, and 3% for the balance) will be imposed.
- Sold within the second year of purchase, i.e. the property is held for more than 1 year and up to 2 years – 2/3 of the full SSD rate.
- Sold within the third year of purchase, i.e. the property is held for more than 2 years and up to 3 years – 1/3 of the full SSD rate.
The extended SSD will not affect HDB lessees as the required Minimum Occupation Period for HDB flats is at least 3 years.
IRAS will be releasing an updated e-tax guide on the circumstances under which SSD will apply and the procedures for paying SSD. The e-tax guide will be available at www.iras.gov.sg. Taxpayers with enquiries may call IRAS at 6351 3697 or 6351 3698.
Increase the Minimum Cash Payment from 5% to 10% of the Valuation Limit for Property Purchasers with one or more outstanding Housing Loans
Previously, property buyers have to make cash payment of at least 5% of the valuation limit5. With effect from 30 Aug 20106, the cash payment is increased from 5% to 10% of the valuation limit7. This measure is applied only to buyers of private residential properties, Executive Condominiums, HUDC flats and HDB flats (including those under the Design, Build and Sell Scheme, or DBSS flats) who are taking housing loans from financial institutions regulated by MAS and who already have one or more outstanding housing loans at the time of applying for a housing loan for the new property purchase.
Decrease the LTV limit for housing loans granted by financial institutions regulated by MAS from the current 80% to 70% for Property Purchasers with one or more outstanding Housing Loans
The LTV limit is lowered from 80% to 70% with effect from 30 Aug 20108 for borrowers who have one or more outstanding housing loans (whether from HDB or a financial institution regulated by MAS) at the time of applying for a housing loan for the new property purchase. Borrowers who do not have any outstanding housing loans continue to have an LTV cap of 80%. These rules apply to housing loans granted by financial institutions for private residential properties, Executive Condominiums, HUDC flats and HDB flats (including DBSS flats).
Loans granted by HDB for HDB flats (including DBSS flats) will still have an LTV cap of 90%. HDB loans are offered to eligible first-time flat buyers and second-timers who are right-sizing their flats to meet their housing needs. They are required to utilise all of their CPF Ordinary Account balance before HDB loans will be granted. Furthermore, those taking a second concessionary HDB loan must use the CPF refund and 50% of the cash proceeds from the sale of their previous flat before they are granted an HDB loan. This is in line with HDB's home ownership policy of helping eligible buyers, especially first-time buyers, purchase public housing in a financially prudent manner.
Financial institutions' lending standards have remained prudent and the asset quality of housing loans has stayed robust, with the non-performing loans ratio at less than 1% as at Q2 2010. Nonetheless, there are signs that more housing loans are originating at higher LTV bands of above 70%. In line with the objective of ensuring a stable and sustainable property market, lowering the LTV limit sends a clear signal to financial institutions to maintain credit standards, and encourages greater financial prudence among property purchasers already servicing one or more outstanding housing loans.
Adequate Supply in the Pipeline
The Government will also continue to ensure that there is adequate supply of housing to meet demand. In the second half 2010 GLS Programme, we have made available sites that can yield about 13,900 private housing units, of which about 8,100 units will be from sites on the Confirmed List. This is the highest potential supply quantum in the history of the GLS Programme. We will inject an even larger supply of private housing in the first half 2011 GLS Programme, if demand continues to be strong.
Apart from the supply from the GLS Programme, there are also 61,800 uncompleted units of private housing from projects in the pipeline as at 2Q20109. Of these, 32,600 units were available or could be made available for sale. These comprised units that had been launched for sale by developers, units that had pre-requisite conditions for sale10 and which could be launched for sale immediately, as well as units with planning approvals for which pre-requisite conditions for sale could be obtained quickly from the Government and made available for sale11.
The Government will continue to monitor the property market closely and will introduce additional measures if required later, to promote a stable and sustainable property market.
The Above Are Issued by the Ministry of National Development, Ministry of Finance and Monetary Authority of Singapore30 August 2010
So what are your views on this and how will this affect you?
----------------------------------------
To be or not to be, there can be only one










1 comments
Many aspects of the rule remains unclear.
1. Is it targeted at Singaporeans or PRs?
2. How many percentage of Singaporeans own more than one property? The "demand" need to be defined.
3. Is the percentage of multiple-property owners above sufficient to cause such a massive hike in property prices in Singapore?
4. Are PRs foreign properties taken into account? (I doubt so, but I could be wrong.) Assuming a PR has several properties in their home country, buying a property in Singapore is as good as owning more than one primary residence.
5. Is the duration of 1 to 3 years sufficient to suppress the prices?
Although we tend to associate penalty as a deterrence from people who abuse the system, we need to see that this is merely a reactive policy. I am not sure if a seller can actually impose the extra payments on the buyer (much like car transfer fees), but if there's indeed a way to get around it officially or on the sideline, this policy is pretty much a white horse.
Also, I have not seen a single country with a sharp increase in population but maintains the same demand for housing these additional millions of people. It bound to rise, regardless of whether there's this rule or not. So technically, the problem isn't just in speculative trading as commonly held as an excuse. The high influx of foreigners also forms part of the problem.
Now, which are we really fixing?
Post a Comment